<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: tarsum &#8211; Calculate Checksum for Files inside Tar Archive</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.guyrutenberg.com/2008/10/24/tarsum-calculate-checksum-for-files-inside-tar-archive/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.guyrutenberg.com/2008/10/24/tarsum-calculate-checksum-for-files-inside-tar-archive/</link>
	<description>Keeping track of what I do</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 09:05:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.guyrutenberg.com/2008/10/24/tarsum-calculate-checksum-for-files-inside-tar-archive/comment-page-1/#comment-19341</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 08:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.guyrutenberg.com/?p=149#comment-19341</guid>
		<description>Hi Jon,

I&#039;ve released the new version of tarsum (0.2) in 
http://www.guyrutenberg.com/2009/04/29/tarsum-02-a-read-only-version-of-tarsum/

I hope it will suit your needs too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jon,</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve released the new version of tarsum (0.2) in<br />
<a href="http://www.guyrutenberg.com/2009/04/29/tarsum-02-a-read-only-version-of-tarsum/" rel="nofollow">http://www.guyrutenberg.com/2009/04/29/tarsum-02-a-read-only-version-of-tarsum/</a></p>
<p>I hope it will suit your needs too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Flowers</title>
		<link>http://www.guyrutenberg.com/2008/10/24/tarsum-calculate-checksum-for-files-inside-tar-archive/comment-page-1/#comment-19231</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Flowers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 08:22:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.guyrutenberg.com/?p=149#comment-19231</guid>
		<description>Yeah thats redhat for you. Working on a program for a production machine, so updating things is not really an option. We tend to have to stick to what our major software provider uses, and right now thats RHEL4. So mktemp version is 1.5. Just a bit older. 

Will be interested in checking out the version that doesn&#039;t write to disk. Thanks for the help.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah thats redhat for you. Working on a program for a production machine, so updating things is not really an option. We tend to have to stick to what our major software provider uses, and right now thats RHEL4. So mktemp version is 1.5. Just a bit older. </p>
<p>Will be interested in checking out the version that doesn&#8217;t write to disk. Thanks for the help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.guyrutenberg.com/2008/10/24/tarsum-calculate-checksum-for-files-inside-tar-archive/comment-page-1/#comment-19130</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 08:53:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.guyrutenberg.com/?p=149#comment-19130</guid>
		<description>Hi Jon,

The current version of tarsum cannot calculate the hashes without writing the file back to the disk. It&#039;s a known limitation I settled with when I&#039;ve decided to write in in Bash. I&#039;m planning to re-write it in Python and then there won&#039;t be any need to actually extract the files back to the disk. So if your interested I suggest checking the blog every once in a while.

About the mktemp error, it looks to me that your using an old version of mktemp. I checked the script with mktemp 6.10.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jon,</p>
<p>The current version of tarsum cannot calculate the hashes without writing the file back to the disk. It&#8217;s a known limitation I settled with when I&#8217;ve decided to write in in Bash. I&#8217;m planning to re-write it in Python and then there won&#8217;t be any need to actually extract the files back to the disk. So if your interested I suggest checking the blog every once in a while.</p>
<p>About the mktemp error, it looks to me that your using an old version of mktemp. I checked the script with mktemp 6.10.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Flowers</title>
		<link>http://www.guyrutenberg.com/2008/10/24/tarsum-calculate-checksum-for-files-inside-tar-archive/comment-page-1/#comment-19087</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Flowers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 13:45:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.guyrutenberg.com/?p=149#comment-19087</guid>
		<description>This looks like it could solve an issue I have, but is there a way to get the md5sum without actually writing the file back to disk? Reason is the actual files can get very large and potential disk space problems...


Also get an error &quot;mktemp: invalid option -- -&quot; this is on RHEL4.6

Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This looks like it could solve an issue I have, but is there a way to get the md5sum without actually writing the file back to disk? Reason is the actual files can get very large and potential disk space problems&#8230;</p>
<p>Also get an error &#8220;mktemp: invalid option &#8212; -&#8221; this is on RHEL4.6</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.guyrutenberg.com/2008/10/24/tarsum-calculate-checksum-for-files-inside-tar-archive/comment-page-1/#comment-6230</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 15:39:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.guyrutenberg.com/?p=149#comment-6230</guid>
		<description>Hi Swami,

I&#039;ve little knowledge of tape drives. As far as I understand, &quot;tarsum /dev/nst0&quot; should work, that&#039;s if /dev/nst0 can be treated as regular tar file (which is what I understand). 

Otherwise, you should copy the tar out of the tape drive, to a temporary location and then use tarsum regularly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Swami,</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve little knowledge of tape drives. As far as I understand, &#8220;tarsum /dev/nst0&#8243; should work, that&#8217;s if /dev/nst0 can be treated as regular tar file (which is what I understand). </p>
<p>Otherwise, you should copy the tar out of the tape drive, to a temporary location and then use tarsum regularly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Swami Kevala</title>
		<link>http://www.guyrutenberg.com/2008/10/24/tarsum-calculate-checksum-for-files-inside-tar-archive/comment-page-1/#comment-6220</link>
		<dc:creator>Swami Kevala</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 08:23:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.guyrutenberg.com/?p=149#comment-6220</guid>
		<description>This is perfect for what I need. However I need to verify checksums of archives stored on magnetic tapes. Is there a way of using tarsum in this way?

e.g. tarsum /dev/nst0</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is perfect for what I need. However I need to verify checksums of archives stored on magnetic tapes. Is there a way of using tarsum in this way?</p>
<p>e.g. tarsum /dev/nst0</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.391 seconds -->
